Regulatory scholarship has traditionally paid much more attention to regulatory policy (the content of the law) than to regulatory practice, and this forum seeks to redress that imbalance.
Professor Sparrow has worked closely with professional regulators for more than 25 years, focusing on the strategic and operational dilemmas that are distinctive to harm-reduction or risk-control tasks of government (as distinct from “customer service” roles), and which may involve the use of coercive power and associated discretion.
Key themes to be address:
- What does it mean to be “risk-based” in enforcement, regulatory, or compliance roles
- What would it take to institutionalize an operational risk-management (or “harm-reduction”) approach as a framework for carrying out tasks and reporting accomplishments
- How do we measure an agency’s contributions to risk reduction?
- What is regulatory craftsmanship, and how might we as an agency deliver it
- What is the relationship between enforcement discretion and effective risk control?
- What are the strengths and weaknesses of alternative regulatory structures (e.g. prescriptive regulation, performance-based regulation, self-regulation, co-regulation, etc.)
- What types of risks ("wicked problems") present special challenges for regulatory operations, and how can those challenges best be met?
Participants will come away with a heightened appreciation of the importance and complexity of the role of the Professional Regulator. They will understand the variety of pressures currently acting on regulatory, enforcement, and security agencies around the world, and the various adaptations available to them as they strive to enhance their effectiveness.
Who will attend?
This course is designed for upper level regulatory and enforcement practitioners, for members of professional boards with oversight responsibilities (e.g. medical boards), and for politicians with regulatory portfolios.
Attend to learn:
- What it means to be “risk-based” in enforcement, regulatory & compliance roles
- Regulatory craftsmanship & how to deliver it
- The harm-reduction approach as a framework for carrying out tasks
- How to measure your agency’s contributions to risk reduction
Malcolm K. Sparrow is a leading international expert in regulatory and enforcement strategy, security and risk control. He is the Professor of the Practice of Public Management at Harvard’s John F. Kennedy School of Government. He is Faculty Chair of the school’s executive program “Strategic Management of Regulatory and Enforcement Agencies.”
He served 10 years with the British Police Service, rising to the rank of Detective Chief Inspector. He has conducted internal affairs investigations, commanded a tactical firearms unit, and has extensive experience with criminal investigation. His research interests include regulatory and enforcement strategy, fraud control, corruption control, and operational risk management.
He holds an MA in mathematics from Cambridge University, an MPA from the Kennedy School, and a PhD in Applied Mathematics from Kent University at Canterbury.
Date: 11 Aug 2019 By: Criterion Content Team
While regulation is often described as a threat to innovation, the two go hand in hand as innovation drives efficiency in regulation and regulation ensures proper practice in innovation. RegTech, the use of new technology to facilitate the delivery of regulatory requirements, has rapidly risen to prominence. Regulators often find themselves without the resources to …
Date: 21 Aug 2018 By: Ash Natesh
Professor Malcolm Sparrow will be in Sydney 17th & 18th September 2018 to lead his acclaimed and valuable executive education course The Professional Regulator – How to be a Risk Based Regulator. The 2 day course is designed to induct all regulatory executives and managers who work within an agency to the teachings of Professor …
Date: 19 Jul 2018 By: Murray Smith
The use of enforcement tools by regulators can be a difficult and unforgiving process. Recently in Canberra the territory’s gambling regulator brought court proceedings against a licensed party and then decided not to continue in favour of a negotiated outcome. The outcome indicated that the regulated party would pay $60,000 to an anti-gambling foundation, put …
Date: 13 Jul 2018 By: Professor Malcolm Sparrow
We hear the phrase “risk-based regulation” quite frequently. Yet there seems to be much greater clarity about what it means for the regulations themselves to be risk-based, and much less clarity about what it means to be a risk-based regulator at the operational level. Regulators, and others with risk-control responsibilities, face a unique set of …